Solar Tax Credit Faces Competing Republican Priorities

As Congress debates the future of the solar tax credit (Investment Tax Credit, or ITC) established by the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), a split has emerged within the Republican Party. At the heart of the divide lies a fundamental conflict: ideological purity versus economic pragmatism. On one side are House conservatives, particularly members of the Freedom Caucus, calling for the immediate elimination of all clean energy tax credits. On the other are Senate Republicans who, while fiscally conservative, are increasingly concerned about the economic consequences of gutting programs that have funneled billions of dollars and thousands of jobs into their red-state districts.

This internal GOP tug-of-war has serious implications for the final version of the “One Big Beautiful Bill” Act (OBBBA), which passed the House in May 2025 and is now under consideration in the Senate. As the legislative process moves forward, the battle over whether solar and battery incentives survive will hinge not just on party lines, but on which Republican faction prevails.

The House Track: Full Repeal of Solar Tax Credits

Conservative Republicans in the House of Representatives have made no secret of their intent to completely dismantle the clean energy tax credits introduced by the IRA. Leading the charge is the House Freedom Caucus, which has demanded full repeal of the solar tax credit, battery storage incentives, and commercial clean energy tax credits.

In a statement cited by The Hill, the Freedom Caucus declared that any version of the OBBBA that includes green energy subsidies would be unacceptable, calling the IRA’s incentives wasteful and ideologically flawed. Representative Chip Roy (R-TX), one of the more vocal critics, described the solar tax credit and other energy tax credits as market distortions that unfairly favor politically selected industries.

The bill passed by the House would:

• Eliminate the 30% residential solar tax credit (ITC) after December 31, 2025
• Phase out the commercial solar tax credits by 2032
• Remove battery storage tax incentives
• Prohibit leased or third-party-owned systems (PPAs) from claiming tax credits

These provisions reflect a broader ideological stance. Fiscal conservatives believe that government support for clean energy undermines free-market principles, inflates the federal deficit, and represents a federal overreach. For many in the House GOP, particularly Freedom Caucus members, the goal is not to reform the IRA—it is to dismantle it entirely.

The Senate Track: Economic Realism & Constituency Pressure

While the House marches toward full repeal of solar tax credits, the Senate presents a more complicated and pragmatic picture. Many Senate Republicans come from states that have directly benefited from the solar and battery incentives. From manufacturing jobs in Georgia and South Carolina to utility-scale solar farms in Texas and North Carolina, the IRA has brought real economic development to GOP districts.

In a New York Times report, nearly 85% of announced investment since the IRA passed has gone to Republican-held districts. This includes tens of billions of dollars in solar panel and battery production facilities, creating long-term jobs and economic growth in communities that have otherwise struggled with industrial decline.

Senators such as Lisa Murkowski (R-AK), John Curtis (R-UT), Jerry Moran (R-KS), and Thom Tillis (R-NC) have all signaled hesitation over the House’s full-repeal approach. These senators are responding to pressure from local governments, business coalitions, and clean energy employers within their states. In many cases, federal credits helped secure private investment deals and long-term contracts that are already underway. For Senate Republicans representing these constituencies, protecting the economic gains may matter more than adhering to ideological consistency.

According to a NPR, moderate Senate Republicans are now actively working on amendments to soften the House bill’s clean energy rollback. Senators such as John Curtis (R-UT) have expressed concern over the abrupt elimination of credits, emphasizing the need for longer phase-out timelines and more predictable transitions.

The Divergence: Conflicting Republican Goals

The divide between House and Senate Republicans reflects a broader tension within the party: one of ideological rigor versus political pragmatism. House Republicans, particularly those in deep-red districts, are unlikely to feel immediate backlash if solar incentives are eliminated. Their voters are less likely to be impacted, and the conservative base rewards symbolic victories over Biden-era policies.

In contrast, Senate Republicans must account for the complex realities on the ground. Many are from states where the IRA has become a job creator and revenue booster. Projects in battery manufacturing, solar installation, and grid resilience have become cornerstones of local development strategies. The fear is that stripping away solar and battery tax credits could lead to canceled projects, job losses, and a chilling effect on future investments.

Growing dissent among some House Republicans highlights the internal conflict over the proposed repeal of clean energy incentives. In a June 2025 letter, a group of 13 House Republicans—including Representatives Nick LaLota (R-NY) and Jen Kiggans (R-VA)—urged party leadership to reconsider provisions that would entirely eliminate solar and battery tax credits.

“We believe the Senate now has a critical opportunity to restore common sense and deliver a truly pro-energy growth final bill that protects taxpayers while also unleashing the potential of U.S. energy producers, manufacturers, and workers,” the House lawmakers wrote in the letter addressed to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Senate Finance Chair Mike Crapo.

This divergence is not just theoretical; it has real implications for whether the Senate version of the bill includes clean energy repeals at all. Senate leadership will be forced to choose: embrace the House’s hardline vision or craft a bill that reflects broader economic concerns.

Leverage and Pressure Points in the Senate

Several dynamics give the Senate leverage to modify or reject the House’s clean energy rollbacks. First, the Byrd Rule provides procedural guardrails during budget reconciliation. If the Senate Parliamentarian rules that certain repeals are not budget-related, they could be removed from the bill entirely.

Second, clean energy advocates and industry groups are exerting tremendous pressure on the Senate. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), the American Clean Power Association (ACP), and companies like Sunrun and Tesla are lobbying aggressively to preserve tax credits for solar and storage. These groups have emphasized the jobs at stake and the consumer savings that could be lost if the credits are eliminated.

Third, moderate Senate Republicans are in a position to negotiate amendments that could preserve some or all of the clean energy provisions. For example, the Senate could:

• Retain the 30% residential solar tax credit but adjust the timeline or eligibility
• Preserve battery storage incentives, especially for grid reliability
• Allow third-party ownership models to continue, maintaining solar access for low-income families

These proposals could form the basis for a compromise version of the bill that balances fiscal restraint with economic continuity.

Three Possible Outcomes

1. Hardline Repeal (House Victory): If House Republicans prevail and the Senate accepts the bill with minimal changes, the residential solar tax credit would end after 2025. Commercial solar tax credit credits would phase out, and third-party systems would lose eligibility. This would likely lead to a sharp drop in installations and investment, especially in low-income and rural areas.
2. Compromise Amendments (Senate Moderation): In this outcome, the Senate amends the bill to retain key portions of the tax credits while removing or scaling back others. A phasedown schedule might replace abrupt repeal. Leasing models may survive. This approach would reduce harm to red-state economies and maintain some stability in clean energy markets.
3. Senate Rewrites the Bill Entirely: Some Senate Republicans have indicated they prefer to write their own version of the legislation. If this happens, clean energy credits may be mostly preserved, and the House will be forced to accept a more moderate version or risk seeing the bill stall entirely.

Solar Tax Credit Faces Uncertain Future

The battle over the solar and battery tax credits is not simply a partisan one—it is a battle for the soul of Republican policymaking. The outcome will depend not just on who holds power, but on what kind of power they choose to wield: ideological consistency or economic pragmatism.

If Senate Republicans stand their ground and demand a more balanced approach, the final bill could preserve key elements of the IRA’s clean energy strategy. If House conservatives get their way, it could unravel one of the most significant renewable energy programs in U.S. history. Either way, the stakes for American homeowners, businesses, and the climate couldn’t be higher.

Contact Green Ridge Solar today to get a free solar and battery backup analysis. Our team of experts are here for all your questions related to solar installation, solar services, battery backup, the solar tax credit, and more.

Use our Solar Calculator to estimate your solar savings and see a 3D rendering of solar panels on your roof.